Guyana vs Mozambique: Total Reserves, per square kilometre
Guyana
0.0026 units per square kilometre
in 2018
Mozambique
0.0026 units per square kilometre
in 2016
Guyana rank
152nd
Mozambique rank
154th
Total Reserves, per square kilometre over time
- Guyana
- Mozambique
How they compare
Guyana currently reports 0.0026 units per square kilometre against 0.0026 units per square kilometre in Mozambique, a difference of 0 units per square kilometre.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Guyana ahead.
Guyana ranks 152nd and Mozambique ranks 154th of 164 countries.
Guyana has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guyana | Mozambique | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0016 units per square kilometre | 0.0015 units per square kilometre | 0.0001 units per square kilometre | Guyana |
| 2010s | 0.0036 units per square kilometre | 0.0033 units per square kilometre | 0.0004 units per square kilometre | Guyana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total reserves, per square kilometre, Guyana or Mozambique?
- Guyana, at 0.0026 units per square kilometre against 0.0026 units per square kilometre in Mozambique as of 2018.
- What is the difference in total reserves, per square kilometre between Guyana and Mozambique?
- 0 units per square kilometre, with Guyana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guyana and Mozambique?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2016.
- How do Guyana and Mozambique rank globally for total reserves, per square kilometre?
- Guyana ranks 152nd and Mozambique ranks 154th of 164 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Total Reserves, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total Reserves divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.