Guatemala vs Morocco: Total Reserves, per square kilometre
Guatemala
0.0831 units per square kilometre
in 2016
Morocco
0.0801 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Guatemala rank
76th
Morocco rank
77th
Total Reserves, per square kilometre over time
- Guatemala
- Morocco
How they compare
Guatemala currently reports 0.0831 units per square kilometre against 0.0801 units per square kilometre in Morocco, a difference of 0.003 units per square kilometre.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Guatemala ahead.
Guatemala ranks 76th and Morocco ranks 77th of 164 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 1 and Morocco in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guatemala | Morocco | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0316 units per square kilometre | 0.0363 units per square kilometre | 0.0047 units per square kilometre | Morocco |
| 2010s | 0.0645 units per square kilometre | 0.0474 units per square kilometre | 0.0171 units per square kilometre | Guatemala |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total reserves, per square kilometre, Guatemala or Morocco?
- Guatemala, at 0.0831 units per square kilometre against 0.0801 units per square kilometre in Morocco as of 2016.
- What is the difference in total reserves, per square kilometre between Guatemala and Morocco?
- 0.003 units per square kilometre, with Guatemala ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Morocco?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2016.
- How do Guatemala and Morocco rank globally for total reserves, per square kilometre?
- Guatemala ranks 76th and Morocco ranks 77th of 164 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Total Reserves, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total Reserves divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.