Fiji vs Latvia: Total Reserves, per square kilometre
Fiji
0.0497 units per square kilometre
in 2016
Latvia
0.0527 units per square kilometre
in 2016
Fiji rank
100th
Latvia rank
98th
Total Reserves, per square kilometre over time
- Fiji
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 0.0527 units per square kilometre against 0.0497 units per square kilometre in Fiji, a difference of 0.003 units per square kilometre.
That makes Latvia's figure about 1.1 times Fiji's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Fiji ahead.
Fiji ranks 100th and Latvia ranks 98th of 164 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Fiji | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0224 units per square kilometre | 0.049 units per square kilometre | 0.0266 units per square kilometre | Latvia |
| 2010s | 0.0481 units per square kilometre | 0.0861 units per square kilometre | 0.038 units per square kilometre | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total reserves, per square kilometre, Fiji or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 0.0527 units per square kilometre against 0.0497 units per square kilometre in Fiji as of 2016.
- What is the difference in total reserves, per square kilometre between Fiji and Latvia?
- 0.003 units per square kilometre, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Fiji and Latvia?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2016.
- How do Fiji and Latvia rank globally for total reserves, per square kilometre?
- Fiji ranks 100th and Latvia ranks 98th of 164 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Total Reserves, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total Reserves divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.