East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Hong Kong: Total Reserves, per square kilometre

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
0.2492 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Hong Kong
405.29 units per square kilometre
in 2023
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) rank
2nd
Hong Kong rank
2nd

Total Reserves, per square kilometre over time

  • East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
  • Hong Kong
0100200300400500199020062023

How they compare

Hong Kong currently reports 405.29 units per square kilometre against 0.2492 units per square kilometre in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income), a difference of 405.04 units per square kilometre.

That makes Hong Kong's figure about 1,626.1 times East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)'s.

Across all 28 years both countries report, Hong Kong has been ahead every year.

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 2nd and Hong Kong ranks 2nd of 10 groups.

Hong Kong has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) Hong Kong Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0149 units per square kilometre 81.57 units per square kilometre 81.55 units per square kilometre Hong Kong
2000s 0.0727 units per square kilometre 135.35 units per square kilometre 135.27 units per square kilometre Hong Kong
2010s 0.2396 units per square kilometre 338.44 units per square kilometre 338.2 units per square kilometre Hong Kong
2020s 0.2471 units per square kilometre 437.67 units per square kilometre 437.43 units per square kilometre Hong Kong

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total reserves, per square kilometre, East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) or Hong Kong?
Hong Kong, at 405.29 units per square kilometre against 0.2492 units per square kilometre in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) as of 2023.
What is the difference in total reserves, per square kilometre between East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Hong Kong?
405.04 units per square kilometre, with Hong Kong ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Hong Kong?
28 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2023.
How do East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Hong Kong rank globally for total reserves, per square kilometre?
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 2nd and Hong Kong ranks 2nd of 10 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Total Reserves, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Hong Kong: Total Reserves, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/total-reserves-per-square-kilometre/east-asia-and-pacific-excluding-high-income/hong-kong-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/total-reserves-per-square-kilometre/east-asia-and-pacific-excluding-high-income/hong-kong-sar-china/">East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Hong Kong: Total Reserves, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Total Reserves, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
174 places, 4,193 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Total Reserves divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.