Djibouti vs Gambia: Total Reserves, per square kilometre
Djibouti
0.0196 units per square kilometre
in 2018
Gambia
0.0189 units per square kilometre
in 2018
Djibouti rank
123rd
Gambia rank
124th
Total Reserves, per square kilometre over time
- Djibouti
- Gambia
How they compare
Djibouti currently reports 0.0196 units per square kilometre against 0.0189 units per square kilometre in Gambia, a difference of 0.0007 units per square kilometre.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 19 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Gambia ahead.
Djibouti ranks 123rd and Gambia ranks 124th of 164 countries.
Gambia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Djibouti | Gambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.005 units per square kilometre | 0.0115 units per square kilometre | 0.0065 units per square kilometre | Gambia |
| 2010s | 0.016 units per square kilometre | 0.0175 units per square kilometre | 0.0015 units per square kilometre | Gambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total reserves, per square kilometre, Djibouti or Gambia?
- Djibouti, at 0.0196 units per square kilometre against 0.0189 units per square kilometre in Gambia as of 2018.
- What is the difference in total reserves, per square kilometre between Djibouti and Gambia?
- 0.0007 units per square kilometre, with Djibouti ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Djibouti and Gambia?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2018.
- How do Djibouti and Gambia rank globally for total reserves, per square kilometre?
- Djibouti ranks 123rd and Gambia ranks 124th of 164 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Total Reserves, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total Reserves divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.