Colombia vs Rwanda: Total Reserves, per square kilometre
Colombia
0.0538 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda
0.0549 units per square kilometre
in 2018
Colombia rank
97th
Rwanda rank
96th
Total Reserves, per square kilometre over time
- Colombia
- Rwanda
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 0.0549 units per square kilometre against 0.0538 units per square kilometre in Colombia, a difference of 0.0011 units per square kilometre.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Colombia ahead.
Colombia ranks 97th and Rwanda ranks 96th of 164 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Colombia averaged higher in 1 and Rwanda in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Colombia | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.014 units per square kilometre | 0.0177 units per square kilometre | 0.0037 units per square kilometre | Rwanda |
| 2010s | 0.0379 units per square kilometre | 0.0363 units per square kilometre | 0.0016 units per square kilometre | Colombia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total reserves, per square kilometre, Colombia or Rwanda?
- Rwanda, at 0.0549 units per square kilometre against 0.0538 units per square kilometre in Colombia as of 2018.
- What is the difference in total reserves, per square kilometre between Colombia and Rwanda?
- 0.0011 units per square kilometre, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Rwanda?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2018.
- How do Colombia and Rwanda rank globally for total reserves, per square kilometre?
- Colombia ranks 97th and Rwanda ranks 96th of 164 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Total Reserves, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total Reserves divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.