Canada vs Uganda: Total Reserves, per square kilometre
Canada
0.0134 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Uganda
0.0167 units per square kilometre
in 2018
Canada rank
130th
Uganda rank
129th
Total Reserves, per square kilometre over time
- Canada
- Uganda
How they compare
Uganda currently reports 0.0167 units per square kilometre against 0.0134 units per square kilometre in Canada, a difference of 0.0033 units per square kilometre.
That makes Uganda's figure about 1.3 times Canada's.
Across all 19 years both countries report, Uganda has been ahead every year.
Canada ranks 130th and Uganda ranks 129th of 164 countries.
Uganda has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Canada | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0042 units per square kilometre | 0.0081 units per square kilometre | 0.0038 units per square kilometre | Uganda |
| 2010s | 0.0083 units per square kilometre | 0.0156 units per square kilometre | 0.0073 units per square kilometre | Uganda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total reserves, per square kilometre, Canada or Uganda?
- Uganda, at 0.0167 units per square kilometre against 0.0134 units per square kilometre in Canada as of 2018.
- What is the difference in total reserves, per square kilometre between Canada and Uganda?
- 0.0033 units per square kilometre, with Uganda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Uganda?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2018.
- How do Canada and Uganda rank globally for total reserves, per square kilometre?
- Canada ranks 130th and Uganda ranks 129th of 164 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Total Reserves, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total Reserves divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.