Burundi vs Laos: Total Reserves, per square kilometre
Burundi
0.0037 units per square kilometre
in 2016
Laos
0.0038 units per square kilometre
in 2016
Burundi rank
147th
Laos rank
146th
Total Reserves, per square kilometre over time
- Burundi
- Laos
How they compare
Laos currently reports 0.0038 units per square kilometre against 0.0037 units per square kilometre in Burundi, a difference of 0.0001 units per square kilometre.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Burundi ahead.
Burundi ranks 147th and Laos ranks 146th of 164 countries.
Burundi has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burundi | Laos | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0048 units per square kilometre | 0.0015 units per square kilometre | 0.0033 units per square kilometre | Burundi |
| 2010s | 0.01 units per square kilometre | 0.0036 units per square kilometre | 0.0064 units per square kilometre | Burundi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total reserves, per square kilometre, Burundi or Laos?
- Laos, at 0.0038 units per square kilometre against 0.0037 units per square kilometre in Burundi as of 2016.
- What is the difference in total reserves, per square kilometre between Burundi and Laos?
- 0.0001 units per square kilometre, with Laos ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Laos?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2016.
- How do Burundi and Laos rank globally for total reserves, per square kilometre?
- Burundi ranks 147th and Laos ranks 146th of 164 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Total Reserves, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total Reserves divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.