Brazil vs Libya: Total Reserves, per square kilometre
Brazil
0.0425 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Libya
0.0376 units per square kilometre
in 2016
Brazil rank
107th
Libya rank
108th
Total Reserves, per square kilometre over time
- Brazil
- Libya
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 0.0425 units per square kilometre against 0.0376 units per square kilometre in Libya, a difference of 0.0049 units per square kilometre.
That makes Brazil's figure about 1.1 times Libya's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Libya ahead.
Brazil ranks 107th and Libya ranks 108th of 164 countries.
Libya has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Libya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0115 units per square kilometre | 0.0261 units per square kilometre | 0.0146 units per square kilometre | Libya |
| 2010s | 0.042 units per square kilometre | 0.0542 units per square kilometre | 0.0122 units per square kilometre | Libya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total reserves, per square kilometre, Brazil or Libya?
- Brazil, at 0.0425 units per square kilometre against 0.0376 units per square kilometre in Libya as of 2023.
- What is the difference in total reserves, per square kilometre between Brazil and Libya?
- 0.0049 units per square kilometre, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Libya?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2016.
- How do Brazil and Libya rank globally for total reserves, per square kilometre?
- Brazil ranks 107th and Libya ranks 108th of 164 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Total Reserves, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total Reserves divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.