Belize vs Kazakhstan: Total Reserves, per square kilometre
Belize
0.0129 units per square kilometre
in 2018
Kazakhstan
0.0133 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Belize rank
132nd
Kazakhstan rank
131st
Total Reserves, per square kilometre over time
- Belize
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 0.0133 units per square kilometre against 0.0129 units per square kilometre in Belize, a difference of 0.0004 units per square kilometre.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Belize ahead.
Belize ranks 132nd and Kazakhstan ranks 131st of 164 countries.
Belize has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belize | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0051 units per square kilometre | 0.004 units per square kilometre | 0.001 units per square kilometre | Belize |
| 2010s | 0.0149 units per square kilometre | 0.0107 units per square kilometre | 0.0042 units per square kilometre | Belize |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total reserves, per square kilometre, Belize or Kazakhstan?
- Kazakhstan, at 0.0133 units per square kilometre against 0.0129 units per square kilometre in Belize as of 2023.
- What is the difference in total reserves, per square kilometre between Belize and Kazakhstan?
- 0.0004 units per square kilometre, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belize and Kazakhstan?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2018.
- How do Belize and Kazakhstan rank globally for total reserves, per square kilometre?
- Belize ranks 132nd and Kazakhstan ranks 131st of 164 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Total Reserves, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total Reserves divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.