Australia vs Congo: Total Reserves, per square kilometre
Australia
0.0077 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo
0.0113 units per square kilometre
in 2008
Australia rank
138th
Congo rank
135th
Total Reserves, per square kilometre over time
- Australia
- Congo
How they compare
Congo currently reports 0.0113 units per square kilometre against 0.0077 units per square kilometre in Australia, a difference of 0.0036 units per square kilometre.
That makes Congo's figure about 1.5 times Australia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Australia ahead.
Australia ranks 138th and Congo ranks 135th of 164 countries.
Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total reserves, per square kilometre, Australia or Congo?
- Congo, at 0.0113 units per square kilometre against 0.0077 units per square kilometre in Australia as of 2008.
- What is the difference in total reserves, per square kilometre between Australia and Congo?
- 0.0036 units per square kilometre, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Congo?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2008.
- How do Australia and Congo rank globally for total reserves, per square kilometre?
- Australia ranks 138th and Congo ranks 135th of 164 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Total Reserves, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total Reserves divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.