Angola vs Botswana: Total Reserves, per square kilometre
Angola
0.0124 units per square kilometre
in 2018
Botswana
0.0117 units per square kilometre
in 2018
Angola rank
133rd
Botswana rank
134th
Total Reserves, per square kilometre over time
- Angola
- Botswana
How they compare
Angola currently reports 0.0124 units per square kilometre against 0.0117 units per square kilometre in Botswana, a difference of 0.0007 units per square kilometre.
That makes Angola's figure about 1.1 times Botswana's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 19 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Botswana ahead.
Angola ranks 133rd and Botswana ranks 134th of 164 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Angola averaged higher in 1 and Botswana in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | Botswana | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0047 units per square kilometre | 0.0125 units per square kilometre | 0.0078 units per square kilometre | Botswana |
| 2010s | 0.0193 units per square kilometre | 0.0134 units per square kilometre | 0.0059 units per square kilometre | Angola |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total reserves, per square kilometre, Angola or Botswana?
- Angola, at 0.0124 units per square kilometre against 0.0117 units per square kilometre in Botswana as of 2018.
- What is the difference in total reserves, per square kilometre between Angola and Botswana?
- 0.0007 units per square kilometre, with Angola ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Botswana?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2018.
- How do Angola and Botswana rank globally for total reserves, per square kilometre?
- Angola ranks 133rd and Botswana ranks 134th of 164 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Total Reserves, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total Reserves divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.