Low income vs Saudi Arabia: Total Reserves, per capita
Low income
0.0001 units per person
in 2010
Saudi Arabia
0.0124 units per person
in 2025
Low income rank
10th
Saudi Arabia rank
10th
Total Reserves, per capita over time
- Low income
- Saudi Arabia
How they compare
Saudi Arabia currently reports 0.0124 units per person against 0.0001 units per person in Low income, a difference of 0.0123 units per person.
That makes Saudi Arabia's figure about 147.3 times Low income's.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Saudi Arabia has been ahead every year.
Low income ranks 10th and Saudi Arabia ranks 10th of 10 groups.
Saudi Arabia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Low income | Saudi Arabia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0001 units per person | 0.0081 units per person | 0.008 units per person | Saudi Arabia |
| 2010s | 0.0001 units per person | 0.0186 units per person | 0.0185 units per person | Saudi Arabia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total reserves, per capita, Low income or Saudi Arabia?
- Saudi Arabia, at 0.0124 units per person against 0.0001 units per person in Low income as of 2025.
- What is the difference in total reserves, per capita between Low income and Saudi Arabia?
- 0.0123 units per person, with Saudi Arabia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Low income and Saudi Arabia?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2010.
- How do Low income and Saudi Arabia rank globally for total reserves, per capita?
- Low income ranks 10th and Saudi Arabia ranks 10th of 10 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Total Reserves, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total Reserves divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.