Laos vs Papua New Guinea: Total Reserves, per capita
Laos
0.0001 units per person
in 2016
Papua New Guinea
0.0002 units per person
in 2016
Laos rank
144th
Papua New Guinea rank
141st
Total Reserves, per capita over time
- Laos
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Papua New Guinea currently reports 0.0002 units per person against 0.0001 units per person in Laos, a difference of 0.0001 units per person.
That makes Papua New Guinea's figure about 1.4 times Laos's.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Papua New Guinea has been ahead every year.
Laos ranks 144th and Papua New Guinea ranks 141st of 164 countries.
Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Laos | Papua New Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0001 units per person | 0.0002 units per person | 0.0001 units per person | Papua New Guinea |
| 2010s | 0.0001 units per person | 0.0003 units per person | 0.0002 units per person | Papua New Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total reserves, per capita, Laos or Papua New Guinea?
- Papua New Guinea, at 0.0002 units per person against 0.0001 units per person in Laos as of 2016.
- What is the difference in total reserves, per capita between Laos and Papua New Guinea?
- 0.0001 units per person, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Laos and Papua New Guinea?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2016.
- How do Laos and Papua New Guinea rank globally for total reserves, per capita?
- Laos ranks 144th and Papua New Guinea ranks 141st of 164 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Total Reserves, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total Reserves divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.