Japan vs South Asia: Total Reserves, per capita
Japan
0.0102 units per person
in 2025
South Asia
0.0004 units per person
in 2025
Japan rank
11th
South Asia rank
9th
Total Reserves, per capita over time
- Japan
- South Asia
How they compare
Japan currently reports 0.0102 units per person against 0.0004 units per person in South Asia, a difference of 0.0098 units per person.
That makes Japan's figure about 23.0 times South Asia's.
Across all 36 years both countries report, Japan has been ahead every year.
Japan ranks 11th and South Asia ranks 9th of 164 countries.
Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Japan | South Asia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0012 units per person | 0 units per person | 0.0012 units per person | Japan |
| 2000s | 0.0058 units per person | 0.0001 units per person | 0.0057 units per person | Japan |
| 2010s | 0.0096 units per person | 0.0003 units per person | 0.0093 units per person | Japan |
| 2020s | 0.0101 units per person | 0.0004 units per person | 0.0097 units per person | Japan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total reserves, per capita, Japan or South Asia?
- Japan, at 0.0102 units per person against 0.0004 units per person in South Asia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in total reserves, per capita between Japan and South Asia?
- 0.0098 units per person, with Japan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and South Asia?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Japan and South Asia rank globally for total reserves, per capita?
- Japan ranks 11th and South Asia ranks 9th of 164 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Total Reserves, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total Reserves divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.