Hong Kong vs Qatar: Total Reserves, per capita
Hong Kong
0.0571 units per person
in 2025
Qatar
0.0691 units per person
in 2025
Hong Kong rank
4th
Qatar rank
3rd
Total Reserves, per capita over time
- Hong Kong
- Qatar
How they compare
Qatar currently reports 0.0691 units per person against 0.0571 units per person in Hong Kong, a difference of 0.012 units per person.
That makes Qatar's figure about 1.2 times Hong Kong's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Hong Kong ahead.
Hong Kong ranks 4th and Qatar ranks 3rd of 164 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Hong Kong averaged higher in 1 and Qatar in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong | Qatar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0131 units per person | 0.0071 units per person | 0.0061 units per person | Hong Kong |
| 2000s | 0.0208 units per person | 0.053 units per person | 0.0322 units per person | Qatar |
| 2010s | 0.0488 units per person | 0.0612 units per person | 0.0124 units per person | Qatar |
| 2020s | 0.06 units per person | 0.0625 units per person | 0.0025 units per person | Qatar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total reserves, per capita, Hong Kong or Qatar?
- Qatar, at 0.0691 units per person against 0.0571 units per person in Hong Kong as of 2025.
- What is the difference in total reserves, per capita between Hong Kong and Qatar?
- 0.012 units per person, with Qatar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and Qatar?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
- How do Hong Kong and Qatar rank globally for total reserves, per capita?
- Hong Kong ranks 4th and Qatar ranks 3rd of 164 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Total Reserves, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total Reserves divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.