China vs Jamaica: Total Reserves, per capita
China
0.0024 units per person
in 2025
Jamaica
0.0022 units per person
in 2025
China rank
54th
Jamaica rank
56th
Total Reserves, per capita over time
- China
- Jamaica
How they compare
China currently reports 0.0024 units per person against 0.0022 units per person in Jamaica, a difference of 0.0002 units per person.
That makes China's figure about 1.1 times Jamaica's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1992 it was China ahead.
China ranks 54th and Jamaica ranks 56th of 164 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, China averaged higher in 3 and Jamaica in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Jamaica | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0001 units per person | 0.0001 units per person | 0.0001 units per person | Jamaica |
| 2000s | 0.0007 units per person | 0.0006 units per person | 0.0001 units per person | China |
| 2010s | 0.0024 units per person | 0.0008 units per person | 0.0016 units per person | China |
| 2020s | 0.0023 units per person | 0.0016 units per person | 0.0007 units per person | China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total reserves, per capita, China or Jamaica?
- China, at 0.0024 units per person against 0.0022 units per person in Jamaica as of 2025.
- What is the difference in total reserves, per capita between China and Jamaica?
- 0.0002 units per person, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Jamaica?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2025.
- How do China and Jamaica rank globally for total reserves, per capita?
- China ranks 54th and Jamaica ranks 56th of 164 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Total Reserves, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total Reserves divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.