China vs Ireland: Total Reserves, per capita
China
0.0024 units per person
in 2025
Ireland
0.0022 units per person
in 2025
China rank
54th
Ireland rank
57th
Total Reserves, per capita over time
- China
- Ireland
How they compare
China currently reports 0.0024 units per person against 0.0022 units per person in Ireland, a difference of 0.0002 units per person.
That makes China's figure about 1.1 times Ireland's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Ireland ahead.
China ranks 54th and Ireland ranks 57th of 164 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, China averaged higher in 3 and Ireland in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Ireland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0001 units per person | 0.0018 units per person | 0.0017 units per person | Ireland |
| 2000s | 0.0007 units per person | 0.0007 units per person | 0 units per person | China |
| 2010s | 0.0024 units per person | 0.0006 units per person | 0.0018 units per person | China |
| 2020s | 0.0023 units per person | 0.0022 units per person | 0.0002 units per person | China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total reserves, per capita, China or Ireland?
- China, at 0.0024 units per person against 0.0022 units per person in Ireland as of 2025.
- What is the difference in total reserves, per capita between China and Ireland?
- 0.0002 units per person, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Ireland?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do China and Ireland rank globally for total reserves, per capita?
- China ranks 54th and Ireland ranks 57th of 164 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Total Reserves, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total Reserves divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.