Cambodia vs Portugal: Total Reserves, per capita
Cambodia
0.0015 units per person
in 2025
Portugal
0.0015 units per person
in 2025
Cambodia rank
79th
Portugal rank
81st
Total Reserves, per capita over time
- Cambodia
- Portugal
How they compare
Cambodia currently reports 0.0015 units per person against 0.0015 units per person in Portugal, a difference of 0 units per person.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Portugal ahead.
Cambodia ranks 79th and Portugal ranks 81st of 164 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Cambodia averaged higher in 1 and Portugal in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cambodia | Portugal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 units per person | 0.0016 units per person | 0.0016 units per person | Portugal |
| 2000s | 0.0001 units per person | 0.0006 units per person | 0.0005 units per person | Portugal |
| 2010s | 0.0005 units per person | 0.0006 units per person | 0.0001 units per person | Portugal |
| 2020s | 0.0012 units per person | 0.001 units per person | 0.0002 units per person | Cambodia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total reserves, per capita, Cambodia or Portugal?
- Cambodia, at 0.0015 units per person against 0.0015 units per person in Portugal as of 2025.
- What is the difference in total reserves, per capita between Cambodia and Portugal?
- 0 units per person, with Cambodia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Portugal?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2025.
- How do Cambodia and Portugal rank globally for total reserves, per capita?
- Cambodia ranks 79th and Portugal ranks 81st of 164 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Total Reserves, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total Reserves divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.