Botswana vs Chile: Total Reserves, per capita
Botswana
0.0029 units per person
in 2018
Chile
0.0027 units per person
in 2025
Botswana rank
45th
Chile rank
48th
Total Reserves, per capita over time
- Botswana
- Chile
How they compare
Botswana currently reports 0.0029 units per person against 0.0027 units per person in Chile, a difference of 0.0002 units per person.
That makes Botswana's figure about 1.1 times Chile's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Botswana ahead.
Botswana ranks 45th and Chile ranks 48th of 164 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 1 and Chile in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Chile | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0038 units per person | 0.0019 units per person | 0.0019 units per person | Botswana |
| 2010s | 0.0035 units per person | 0.0038 units per person | 0.0003 units per person | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total reserves, per capita, Botswana or Chile?
- Botswana, at 0.0029 units per person against 0.0027 units per person in Chile as of 2018.
- What is the difference in total reserves, per capita between Botswana and Chile?
- 0.0002 units per person, with Botswana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Chile?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2018.
- How do Botswana and Chile rank globally for total reserves, per capita?
- Botswana ranks 45th and Chile ranks 48th of 164 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Total Reserves, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total Reserves divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.