Lithuania vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Total net enrolment rate, upper secondary, male
Total net enrolment rate, upper secondary, male over time
- Lithuania
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
How they compare
Saint Kitts and Nevis currently reports 96.2% against 96.2% in Lithuania, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Lithuania ahead.
Lithuania ranks 16th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 15th of 142 countries.
Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Saint Kitts and Nevis | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 89.4% | 61.9% | 27.5% | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 96.0% | 89.2% | 6.7% | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total net enrolment rate, upper secondary, male, Lithuania or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- Saint Kitts and Nevis, at 96.2% against 96.2% in Lithuania as of 2016.
- What is the difference in total net enrolment rate, upper secondary, male between Lithuania and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 0.0%, with Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2016.
- How do Lithuania and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for total net enrolment rate, upper secondary, male?
- Lithuania ranks 16th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 15th of 142 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Total net enrolment rate, upper secondary, male (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total number of male students of the official age group for upper secondary education who are enrolled in any level of education, expressed as a percentage of the corresponding male population. Divide the total number of male students in the official school age range for upper secondary education who are enrolled in any level of education by the male population of the same age group and multiply the result by 100. The difference between the total NER and the adjusted NER provides a measure of the proportion of children in the official relevant school age group who are enrolled in levels of education below the one intended for their age. The difference between the total NER and the adjusted NER for upper secondary education is due to enrolment in pre-primary or primary education. The total NER should be based on total enrolment of the official relevant school age group in any level of education for all types of schools and education institutions, including public, private and all other institutions that provide organized educational programmes. For more information, consult the UIS website: http://www.uis.unesco.org/Education/