East Asia & Pacific vs Latvia: Total net enrolment rate, upper secondary, female
Total net enrolment rate, upper secondary, female over time
- East Asia & Pacific
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 96.4% against 83.8% in East Asia & Pacific, a difference of 12.6%.
That makes Latvia's figure about 1.1 times East Asia & Pacific's.
Across all 11 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
East Asia & Pacific ranks 12th and Latvia ranks 15th of 43 groups.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | East Asia & Pacific | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 73.6% | 91.8% | 18.2% | Latvia |
| 2010s | 79.8% | 95.0% | 15.2% | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total net enrolment rate, upper secondary, female, East Asia & Pacific or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 96.4% against 83.8% in East Asia & Pacific as of 2018.
- What is the difference in total net enrolment rate, upper secondary, female between East Asia & Pacific and Latvia?
- 12.6%, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific and Latvia?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2018.
- How do East Asia & Pacific and Latvia rank globally for total net enrolment rate, upper secondary, female?
- East Asia & Pacific ranks 12th and Latvia ranks 15th of 43 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Total net enrolment rate, upper secondary, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total number of female students of the official age group for upper secondary education who are enrolled in any level of education, expressed as a percentage of the corresponding female population. Divide the total number of female students in the official school age range for upper secondary education who are enrolled in any level of education by the female population of the same age group and multiply the result by 100. The difference between the total NER and the adjusted NER provides a measure of the proportion of children in the official relevant school age group who are enrolled in levels of education below the one intended for their age. The difference between the total NER and the adjusted NER for upper secondary education is due to enrolment in pre-primary or primary education. The total NER should be based on total enrolment of the official relevant school age group in any level of education for all types of schools and education institutions, including public, private and all other institutions that provide organized educational programmes. For more information, consult the UIS website: http://www.uis.unesco.org/Education/