IBRD only vs Latvia: Total net enrolment rate, upper secondary, both sexes
Total net enrolment rate, upper secondary, both sexes over time
- IBRD only
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 95.7% against 68.2% in IBRD only, a difference of 27.5%.
That makes Latvia's figure about 1.4 times IBRD only's.
Across all 11 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
IBRD only ranks 23rd and Latvia ranks 22nd of 43 groups.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | IBRD only | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 61.9% | 91.0% | 29.0% | Latvia |
| 2010s | 66.6% | 94.4% | 27.8% | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total net enrolment rate, upper secondary, both sexes, IBRD only or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 95.7% against 68.2% in IBRD only as of 2018.
- What is the difference in total net enrolment rate, upper secondary, both sexes between IBRD only and Latvia?
- 27.5%, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for IBRD only and Latvia?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2018.
- How do IBRD only and Latvia rank globally for total net enrolment rate, upper secondary, both sexes?
- IBRD only ranks 23rd and Latvia ranks 22nd of 43 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Total net enrolment rate, upper secondary, both sexes (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total number of students of the official age group for upper secondary education who are enrolled in any level of education, expressed as a percentage of the corresponding population. Divide the total number of students in the official school age range for upper secondary education who are enrolled in any level of education by the population of the same age group and multiply the result by 100. The difference between the total NER and the adjusted NER provides a measure of the proportion of children in the official relevant school age group who are enrolled in levels of education below the one intended for their age. The difference between the total NER and the adjusted NER for upper secondary education is due to enrolment in pre-primary or primary education. The total NER should be based on total enrolment of the official relevant school age group in any level of education for all types of schools and education institutions, including public, private and all other institutions that provide organized educational programmes. For more information, consult the UIS website: http://www.uis.unesco.org/Education/