IBRD only vs Liechtenstein: Total net enrolment rate, lower secondary, male
Total net enrolment rate, lower secondary, male over time
- IBRD only
- Liechtenstein
How they compare
Liechtenstein currently reports 98.6% against 89.9% in IBRD only, a difference of 8.7%.
That makes Liechtenstein's figure about 1.1 times IBRD only's.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Liechtenstein has been ahead every year.
IBRD only ranks 20th and Liechtenstein ranks 24th of 43 groups.
Liechtenstein has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | IBRD only | Liechtenstein | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 85.9% | 95.7% | 9.7% | Liechtenstein |
| 2010s | 89.0% | 97.9% | 8.9% | Liechtenstein |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total net enrolment rate, lower secondary, male, IBRD only or Liechtenstein?
- Liechtenstein, at 98.6% against 89.9% in IBRD only as of 2018.
- What is the difference in total net enrolment rate, lower secondary, male between IBRD only and Liechtenstein?
- 8.7%, with Liechtenstein ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for IBRD only and Liechtenstein?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2018.
- How do IBRD only and Liechtenstein rank globally for total net enrolment rate, lower secondary, male?
- IBRD only ranks 20th and Liechtenstein ranks 24th of 43 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Total net enrolment rate, lower secondary, male (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total number of male students of the official age group for lower secondary education who are enrolled in any level of education, expressed as a percentage of the corresponding male population. Divide the total number of male students in the official school age range for lower secondary education who are enrolled in any level of education by the male population of the same age group and multiply the result by 100. The difference between the total NER and the adjusted NER provides a measure of the proportion of children in the official relevant school age group who are enrolled in levels of education below the one intended for their age. The difference between the total NER and the adjusted NER for lower secondary education is due to enrolment in pre-primary or primary education. The total NER should be based on total enrolment of the official relevant school age group in any level of education for all types of schools and education institutions, including public, private and all other institutions that provide organized educational programmes.