East Asia & Pacific vs Uruguay: Total net enrolment rate, lower secondary, male
Total net enrolment rate, lower secondary, male over time
- East Asia & Pacific
- Uruguay
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 98.7% against 90.1% in East Asia & Pacific, a difference of 8.6%.
That makes Uruguay's figure about 1.1 times East Asia & Pacific's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Uruguay ahead.
East Asia & Pacific ranks 19th and Uruguay ranks 22nd of 43 groups.
Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | East Asia & Pacific | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 89.2% | 91.6% | 2.4% | Uruguay |
| 2010s | 90.4% | 92.2% | 1.8% | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total net enrolment rate, lower secondary, male, East Asia & Pacific or Uruguay?
- Uruguay, at 98.7% against 90.1% in East Asia & Pacific as of 2016.
- What is the difference in total net enrolment rate, lower secondary, male between East Asia & Pacific and Uruguay?
- 8.6%, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific and Uruguay?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2016.
- How do East Asia & Pacific and Uruguay rank globally for total net enrolment rate, lower secondary, male?
- East Asia & Pacific ranks 19th and Uruguay ranks 22nd of 43 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Total net enrolment rate, lower secondary, male (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total number of male students of the official age group for lower secondary education who are enrolled in any level of education, expressed as a percentage of the corresponding male population. Divide the total number of male students in the official school age range for lower secondary education who are enrolled in any level of education by the male population of the same age group and multiply the result by 100. The difference between the total NER and the adjusted NER provides a measure of the proportion of children in the official relevant school age group who are enrolled in levels of education below the one intended for their age. The difference between the total NER and the adjusted NER for lower secondary education is due to enrolment in pre-primary or primary education. The total NER should be based on total enrolment of the official relevant school age group in any level of education for all types of schools and education institutions, including public, private and all other institutions that provide organized educational programmes.