Eswatini vs Hong Kong: Total net enrolment rate, lower secondary, female
Total net enrolment rate, lower secondary, female over time
- Eswatini
- Hong Kong
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 97.1% against 97.0% in Hong Kong, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 1977 it was Hong Kong ahead.
Eswatini ranks 46th and Hong Kong ranks 47th of 135 countries.
Hong Kong has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Hong Kong | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 62.2% | 72.8% | 10.7% | Hong Kong |
| 2000s | 90.3% | 98.7% | 8.4% | Hong Kong |
| 2010s | 93.9% | 95.6% | 1.7% | Hong Kong |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total net enrolment rate, lower secondary, female, Eswatini or Hong Kong?
- Eswatini, at 97.1% against 97.0% in Hong Kong as of 2015.
- What is the difference in total net enrolment rate, lower secondary, female between Eswatini and Hong Kong?
- 0.1%, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Hong Kong?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 1977 to 2014.
- How do Eswatini and Hong Kong rank globally for total net enrolment rate, lower secondary, female?
- Eswatini ranks 46th and Hong Kong ranks 47th of 135 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Total net enrolment rate, lower secondary, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total number of female students of the official age group for lower secondary education who are enrolled in any level of education, expressed as a percentage of the corresponding female population. Divide the total number of female students in the official school age range for lower secondary education who are enrolled in any level of education by the female population of the same age group and multiply the result by 100. The difference between the total NER and the adjusted NER provides a measure of the proportion of children in the official relevant school age group who are enrolled in levels of education below the one intended for their age. The difference between the total NER and the adjusted NER for lower secondary education is due to enrolment in pre-primary or primary education. The total NER should be based on total enrolment of the official relevant school age group in any level of education for all types of schools and education institutions, including public, private and all other institutions that provide organized educational programmes.