IDA blend vs Latvia: Total net enrolment rate, lower secondary, both sexes
Total net enrolment rate, lower secondary, both sexes over time
- IDA blend
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 99.0% against 72.6% in IDA blend, a difference of 26.4%.
That makes Latvia's figure about 1.4 times IDA blend's.
Across all 11 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
IDA blend ranks 34th and Latvia ranks 31st of 43 groups.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | IDA blend | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 57.8% | 99.9% | 42.0% | Latvia |
| 2010s | 65.9% | 98.7% | 32.8% | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total net enrolment rate, lower secondary, both sexes, IDA blend or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 99.0% against 72.6% in IDA blend as of 2018.
- What is the difference in total net enrolment rate, lower secondary, both sexes between IDA blend and Latvia?
- 26.4%, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for IDA blend and Latvia?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2018.
- How do IDA blend and Latvia rank globally for total net enrolment rate, lower secondary, both sexes?
- IDA blend ranks 34th and Latvia ranks 31st of 43 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Total net enrolment rate, lower secondary, both sexes (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total number of students of the official age group for lower secondary education who are enrolled in any level of education, expressed as a percentage of the corresponding population. Divide the total number of students in the official school age range for lower secondary education who are enrolled in any level of education by the population of the same age group and multiply the result by 100. The difference between the total NER and the adjusted NER provides a measure of the proportion of children in the official relevant school age group who are enrolled in levels of education below the one intended for their age. The difference between the total NER and the adjusted NER for lower secondary education is due to enrolment in pre-primary or primary education. The total NER should be based on total enrolment of the official relevant school age group in any level of education for all types of schools and education institutions, including public, private and all other institutions that provide organized educational programmes.