East Asia & Pacific vs Samoa: Total net enrolment rate, lower secondary, both sexes
Total net enrolment rate, lower secondary, both sexes over time
- East Asia & Pacific
- Samoa
How they compare
Samoa currently reports 99.7% against 90.8% in East Asia & Pacific, a difference of 8.9%.
That makes Samoa's figure about 1.1 times East Asia & Pacific's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 1998 it was Samoa ahead.
East Asia & Pacific ranks 16th and Samoa ranks 18th of 43 groups.
Samoa has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | East Asia & Pacific | Samoa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 77.6% | 91.2% | 13.7% | Samoa |
| 2000s | 82.4% | 90.4% | 7.9% | Samoa |
| 2010s | 91.0% | 99.7% | 8.6% | Samoa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total net enrolment rate, lower secondary, both sexes, East Asia & Pacific or Samoa?
- Samoa, at 99.7% against 90.8% in East Asia & Pacific as of 2014.
- What is the difference in total net enrolment rate, lower secondary, both sexes between East Asia & Pacific and Samoa?
- 8.9%, with Samoa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific and Samoa?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2014.
- How do East Asia & Pacific and Samoa rank globally for total net enrolment rate, lower secondary, both sexes?
- East Asia & Pacific ranks 16th and Samoa ranks 18th of 43 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Total net enrolment rate, lower secondary, both sexes (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total number of students of the official age group for lower secondary education who are enrolled in any level of education, expressed as a percentage of the corresponding population. Divide the total number of students in the official school age range for lower secondary education who are enrolled in any level of education by the population of the same age group and multiply the result by 100. The difference between the total NER and the adjusted NER provides a measure of the proportion of children in the official relevant school age group who are enrolled in levels of education below the one intended for their age. The difference between the total NER and the adjusted NER for lower secondary education is due to enrolment in pre-primary or primary education. The total NER should be based on total enrolment of the official relevant school age group in any level of education for all types of schools and education institutions, including public, private and all other institutions that provide organized educational programmes.