Early-demographic dividend vs Hong Kong, China: Total net enrolment rate, lower secondary, both sexes
Total net enrolment rate, lower secondary, both sexes over time
- Early-demographic dividend
- Hong Kong, China
How they compare
Hong Kong, China currently reports 99.4% against 84.4% in Early-demographic dividend, a difference of 15.0%.
That makes Hong Kong, China's figure about 1.2 times Early-demographic dividend's.
Across all 19 years both countries report, Hong Kong, China has been ahead every year.
Early-demographic dividend ranks 28th and Hong Kong, China ranks 23rd of 45 groups.
Hong Kong, China has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Early-demographic dividend | Hong Kong, China | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 73.2% | 94.6% | 21.5% | Hong Kong, China |
| 2010s | 82.3% | 98.0% | 15.6% | Hong Kong, China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total net enrolment rate, lower secondary, both sexes, Early-demographic dividend or Hong Kong, China?
- Hong Kong, China, at 99.4% against 84.4% in Early-demographic dividend as of 2019.
- What is the difference in total net enrolment rate, lower secondary, both sexes between Early-demographic dividend and Hong Kong, China?
- 15.0%, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Early-demographic dividend and Hong Kong, China?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2019.
- How do Early-demographic dividend and Hong Kong, China rank globally for total net enrolment rate, lower secondary, both sexes?
- Early-demographic dividend ranks 28th and Hong Kong, China ranks 23rd of 45 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Total net enrolment rate, lower secondary, both sexes (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total number of students of the official age group for lower secondary education who are enrolled in any level of education, expressed as a percentage of the corresponding population. Divide the total number of students in the official school age range for lower secondary education who are enrolled in any level of education by the population of the same age group and multiply the result by 100. The difference between the total NER and the adjusted NER provides a measure of the proportion of children in the official relevant school age group who are enrolled in levels of education below the one intended for their age. The difference between the total NER and the adjusted NER for lower secondary education is due to enrolment in pre-primary or primary education. The total NER should be based on total enrolment of the official relevant school age group in any level of education for all types of schools and education institutions, including public, private and all other institutions that provide organized educational programmes.