Latvia vs Namibia: Total labor force in the sample, aged 15-64, rural
Latvia
350,995
in 2016
Namibia
252,760
in 2015
Latvia rank
76th
Namibia rank
77th
Total labor force in the sample, aged 15-64, rural over time
- Latvia
- Namibia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 350,995 against 252,760 in Namibia, a difference of 98,235.
That makes Latvia's figure about 1.4 times Namibia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Namibia ahead.
Latvia ranks 76th and Namibia ranks 77th of 96 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 1 and Namibia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 281,500 | 375,726 | 94,226 | Namibia |
| 2010s | 428,860 | 292,227 | 136,633 | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total labor force in the sample, aged 15-64, rural, Latvia or Namibia?
- Latvia, at 350,995 against 252,760 in Namibia as of 2016.
- What is the difference in total labor force in the sample, aged 15-64, rural between Latvia and Namibia?
- 98,235, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Namibia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2015.
- How do Latvia and Namibia rank globally for total labor force in the sample, aged 15-64, rural?
- Latvia ranks 76th and Namibia ranks 77th of 96 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Total labor force in the sample, aged 15-64, rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.