Chile vs Georgia: Total labor force in the sample, aged 15-64, rural

Chile
881,103
in 2017
Georgia
867,994
in 2020
Chile rank
61st
Georgia rank
62nd

Total labor force in the sample, aged 15-64, rural over time

  • Chile
  • Georgia
01.0M2.0M3.0M198720032020

How they compare

Chile currently reports 881,103 against 867,994 in Georgia, a difference of 13,109.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 1998 it was Chile ahead.

Chile ranks 61st and Georgia ranks 62nd of 93 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 2 and Georgia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Georgia Difference Ahead
1990s 707,315 0 707,315 Chile
2000s 727,546 829,792 102,246 Georgia
2010s 851,717 748,855 102,862 Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total labor force in the sample, aged 15-64, rural, Chile or Georgia?
Chile, at 881,103 against 867,994 in Georgia as of 2017.
What is the difference in total labor force in the sample, aged 15-64, rural between Chile and Georgia?
13,109, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Georgia?
9 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2017.
How do Chile and Georgia rank globally for total labor force in the sample, aged 15-64, rural?
Chile ranks 61st and Georgia ranks 62nd of 93 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Total labor force in the sample, aged 15-64, rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Total labor force in the sample, aged 15-64, rural
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
95 places, 1,336 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed