Malawi vs Slovenia: Total GHG emissions by sector (Mt CO2 eq) - Waste
Total GHG emissions by sector (Mt CO2 eq) - Waste over time
- Malawi
- Slovenia
How they compare
Slovenia currently reports 0.51 against 0.44 in Malawi, a difference of 0.07.
That makes Slovenia's figure about 1.2 times Malawi's.
Across all 29 years both countries report, Slovenia has been ahead every year.
Malawi ranks 140th and Slovenia ranks 139th of 187 countries.
Slovenia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malawi | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.211 | 0.713 | 0.502 | Slovenia |
| 2000s | 0.283 | 0.774 | 0.491 | Slovenia |
| 2010s | 0.3889 | 0.5544 | 0.1656 | Slovenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total ghg emissions by sector (mt co2 eq) - waste, Malawi or Slovenia?
- Slovenia, at 0.51 against 0.44 in Malawi as of 2018.
- What is the difference in total ghg emissions by sector (mt co2 eq) - waste between Malawi and Slovenia?
- 0.07, with Slovenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Slovenia?
- 29 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2018.
- How do Malawi and Slovenia rank globally for total ghg emissions by sector (mt co2 eq) - waste?
- Malawi ranks 140th and Slovenia ranks 139th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Climate Watch. 2020. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute. Available online at: https://www.climatewatchdata.org, published as Total GHG emissions by sector (Mt CO2 eq) - Waste. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Waste sector greenhouse gas emissions are generated from the World Resource Institute's Climate Watch. Climate Watch Historical Emission data contains sector-level greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions data for 194 countries and the European Union (EU) for the period 1990-2018, including emissions of the six major GHGs from most major sources and sinks. Non-CO2 emissions are expressed in CO2 equivalents using 100-year global warming potential values from IPCC Fourth Assessment Report. Climate Watch Historical GHG Emissions data (previously published through CAIT Climate Data Explorer) are derived from several sources. Any use of the Land-Use Change and Forestry or Agriculture indicator should be cited as FAO 2020, FAOSTAT Emissions Database. Any use of CO2 emissions from fuel combustion data should be cited as CO2 Emissions from Fuel Combustion, OECD/IEA, 2020.