Estonia vs Malawi: Total GHG emissions by sector (Mt CO2 eq) - Total excluding LUCF
Total GHG emissions by sector (Mt CO2 eq) - Total excluding LUCF over time
- Estonia
- Malawi
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 18.61 against 18.32 in Malawi, a difference of 0.29.
Across all 29 years both countries report, Estonia has been ahead every year.
Estonia ranks 118th and Malawi ranks 119th of 189 countries.
Estonia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 24.06 | 8.74 | 15.32 | Estonia |
| 2000s | 19.16 | 10.28 | 8.88 | Estonia |
| 2010s | 19.78 | 14.82 | 4.96 | Estonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total ghg emissions by sector (mt co2 eq) - total excluding lucf, Estonia or Malawi?
- Estonia, at 18.61 against 18.32 in Malawi as of 2018.
- What is the difference in total ghg emissions by sector (mt co2 eq) - total excluding lucf between Estonia and Malawi?
- 0.29, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Malawi?
- 29 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2018.
- How do Estonia and Malawi rank globally for total ghg emissions by sector (mt co2 eq) - total excluding lucf?
- Estonia ranks 118th and Malawi ranks 119th of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Climate Watch. 2020. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute. Available online at: https://www.climatewatchdata.org, published as Total GHG emissions by sector (Mt CO2 eq) - Total excluding LUCF. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total greenhouse gas emissions (excluding LUCF) are generated from the World Resource Institute's Climate Watch. Climate Watch Historical Emission data contains sector-level greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions data for 194 countries and the European Union (EU) for the period 1990-2018, including emissions of the six major GHGs from most major sources and sinks. Non-CO2 emissions are expressed in CO2 equivalents using 100-year global warming potential values from IPCC Fourth Assessment Report. Climate Watch Historical GHG Emissions data (previously published through CAIT Climate Data Explorer) are derived from several sources. Any use of the Land-Use Change and Forestry or Agriculture indicator should be cited as FAO 2020, FAOSTAT Emissions Database. Any use of CO2 emissions from fuel combustion data should be cited as CO2 Emissions from Fuel Combustion, OECD/IEA, 2020.