Libya vs Uganda: Time to import: Documentary compliance (hours)
Time to import: Documentary compliance (hours) over time
- Libya
- Uganda
How they compare
Libya currently reports 96 DB16-20 methodology against 96 DB16-20 methodology in Uganda, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Uganda has been ahead every year.
Libya ranks 33rd and Uganda ranks 33rd of 186 countries.
Uganda has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher time to import: documentary compliance (hours), Libya or Uganda?
- Libya, at 96 DB16-20 methodology against 96 DB16-20 methodology in Uganda as of 2019.
- What is the difference in time to import: documentary compliance (hours) between Libya and Uganda?
- 0 DB16-20 methodology, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Uganda?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Libya and Uganda rank globally for time to import: documentary compliance (hours)?
- Libya ranks 33rd and Uganda ranks 33rd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Time to import: Documentary compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The time for documentary compliance to import records the time associated with compliance with the import documentary requirements of all government agencies of the origin economy, the destination economy and any transit economies. It is calculated in hours. It includes the time for obtaining documents, preparing documents, processing documents, presenting documents and submitting documents. All electronic or paper submissions of information requested by any government agency in connection with the shipment are considered to be documents obtained, prepared and submitted during the import process. All documents prepared by the freight forwarder or customs broker for the product and partner pair assumed in the case study are included regardless of whether they are required by law or in practice. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.