Equatorial Guinea vs Ethiopia: Time to import: Documentary compliance (hours)
Time to import: Documentary compliance (hours) over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Ethiopia
How they compare
Equatorial Guinea currently reports 240 DB16-20 methodology against 194 DB16-20 methodology in Ethiopia, a difference of 46 DB16-20 methodology.
That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 1.2 times Ethiopia's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Equatorial Guinea has been ahead every year.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 5th and Ethiopia ranks 8th of 186 countries.
Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher time to import: documentary compliance (hours), Equatorial Guinea or Ethiopia?
- Equatorial Guinea, at 240 DB16-20 methodology against 194 DB16-20 methodology in Ethiopia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in time to import: documentary compliance (hours) between Equatorial Guinea and Ethiopia?
- 46 DB16-20 methodology, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Ethiopia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Ethiopia rank globally for time to import: documentary compliance (hours)?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 5th and Ethiopia ranks 8th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Time to import: Documentary compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The time for documentary compliance to import records the time associated with compliance with the import documentary requirements of all government agencies of the origin economy, the destination economy and any transit economies. It is calculated in hours. It includes the time for obtaining documents, preparing documents, processing documents, presenting documents and submitting documents. All electronic or paper submissions of information requested by any government agency in connection with the shipment are considered to be documents obtained, prepared and submitted during the import process. All documents prepared by the freight forwarder or customs broker for the product and partner pair assumed in the case study are included regardless of whether they are required by law or in practice. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.