Djibouti vs Uruguay: Time to import: Documentary compliance (hours)
Time to import: Documentary compliance (hours) over time
- Djibouti
- Uruguay
How they compare
Djibouti currently reports 50 DB16-20 methodology against 48 DB16-20 methodology in Uruguay, a difference of 2 DB16-20 methodology.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Uruguay ahead.
Djibouti ranks 68th and Uruguay ranks 69th of 189 countries.
Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher time to import: documentary compliance (hours), Djibouti or Uruguay?
- Djibouti, at 50 DB16-20 methodology against 48 DB16-20 methodology in Uruguay as of 2019.
- What is the difference in time to import: documentary compliance (hours) between Djibouti and Uruguay?
- 2 DB16-20 methodology, with Djibouti ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Djibouti and Uruguay?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Djibouti and Uruguay rank globally for time to import: documentary compliance (hours)?
- Djibouti ranks 68th and Uruguay ranks 69th of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Time to import: Documentary compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The time for documentary compliance to import records the time associated with compliance with the import documentary requirements of all government agencies of the origin economy, the destination economy and any transit economies. It is calculated in hours. It includes the time for obtaining documents, preparing documents, processing documents, presenting documents and submitting documents. All electronic or paper submissions of information requested by any government agency in connection with the shipment are considered to be documents obtained, prepared and submitted during the import process. All documents prepared by the freight forwarder or customs broker for the product and partner pair assumed in the case study are included regardless of whether they are required by law or in practice. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.