Côte d'Ivoire vs Kyrgyzstan: Time to import: Documentary compliance (hours)
Time to import: Documentary compliance (hours) over time
- Côte d'Ivoire
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Côte d'Ivoire currently reports 89.14 DB16-20 methodology against 84 DB16-20 methodology in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 5.14 DB16-20 methodology.
That makes Côte d'Ivoire's figure about 1.1 times Kyrgyzstan's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Côte d'Ivoire has been ahead every year.
Côte d'Ivoire ranks 42nd and Kyrgyzstan ranks 43rd of 188 countries.
Côte d'Ivoire has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher time to import: documentary compliance (hours), Côte d'Ivoire or Kyrgyzstan?
- Côte d'Ivoire, at 89.14 DB16-20 methodology against 84 DB16-20 methodology in Kyrgyzstan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in time to import: documentary compliance (hours) between Côte d'Ivoire and Kyrgyzstan?
- 5.14 DB16-20 methodology, with Côte d'Ivoire ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Côte d'Ivoire and Kyrgyzstan?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Côte d'Ivoire and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for time to import: documentary compliance (hours)?
- Côte d'Ivoire ranks 42nd and Kyrgyzstan ranks 43rd of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Time to import: Documentary compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The time for documentary compliance to import records the time associated with compliance with the import documentary requirements of all government agencies of the origin economy, the destination economy and any transit economies. It is calculated in hours. It includes the time for obtaining documents, preparing documents, processing documents, presenting documents and submitting documents. All electronic or paper submissions of information requested by any government agency in connection with the shipment are considered to be documents obtained, prepared and submitted during the import process. All documents prepared by the freight forwarder or customs broker for the product and partner pair assumed in the case study are included regardless of whether they are required by law or in practice. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.