Comoros vs Tunisia: Time to import: Documentary compliance (hours)
Time to import: Documentary compliance (hours) over time
- Comoros
- Tunisia
How they compare
Tunisia currently reports 26.92 DB16-20 methodology against 26 DB16-20 methodology in Comoros, a difference of 0.92 DB16-20 methodology.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Comoros ahead.
Comoros ranks 102nd and Tunisia ranks 101st of 186 countries.
Comoros has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher time to import: documentary compliance (hours), Comoros or Tunisia?
- Tunisia, at 26.92 DB16-20 methodology against 26 DB16-20 methodology in Comoros as of 2019.
- What is the difference in time to import: documentary compliance (hours) between Comoros and Tunisia?
- 0.92 DB16-20 methodology, with Tunisia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and Tunisia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Comoros and Tunisia rank globally for time to import: documentary compliance (hours)?
- Comoros ranks 102nd and Tunisia ranks 101st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Time to import: Documentary compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The time for documentary compliance to import records the time associated with compliance with the import documentary requirements of all government agencies of the origin economy, the destination economy and any transit economies. It is calculated in hours. It includes the time for obtaining documents, preparing documents, processing documents, presenting documents and submitting documents. All electronic or paper submissions of information requested by any government agency in connection with the shipment are considered to be documents obtained, prepared and submitted during the import process. All documents prepared by the freight forwarder or customs broker for the product and partner pair assumed in the case study are included regardless of whether they are required by law or in practice. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.