Australia vs Thailand: Time to import: Documentary compliance (hours)
Time to import: Documentary compliance (hours) over time
- Australia
- Thailand
How they compare
Australia currently reports 4 DB16-20 methodology against 4 DB16-20 methodology in Thailand, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Thailand has been ahead every year.
Australia ranks 137th and Thailand ranks 137th of 189 countries.
Thailand has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher time to import: documentary compliance (hours), Australia or Thailand?
- Australia, at 4 DB16-20 methodology against 4 DB16-20 methodology in Thailand as of 2019.
- What is the difference in time to import: documentary compliance (hours) between Australia and Thailand?
- 0 DB16-20 methodology, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Thailand?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Australia and Thailand rank globally for time to import: documentary compliance (hours)?
- Australia ranks 137th and Thailand ranks 137th of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Time to import: Documentary compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The time for documentary compliance to import records the time associated with compliance with the import documentary requirements of all government agencies of the origin economy, the destination economy and any transit economies. It is calculated in hours. It includes the time for obtaining documents, preparing documents, processing documents, presenting documents and submitting documents. All electronic or paper submissions of information requested by any government agency in connection with the shipment are considered to be documents obtained, prepared and submitted during the import process. All documents prepared by the freight forwarder or customs broker for the product and partner pair assumed in the case study are included regardless of whether they are required by law or in practice. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.