Argentina vs Iraq: Time to import: Documentary compliance (hours)
Time to import: Documentary compliance (hours) over time
- Argentina
- Iraq
How they compare
Iraq currently reports 176 DB16-20 methodology against 166 DB16-20 methodology in Argentina, a difference of 10 DB16-20 methodology.
That makes Iraq's figure about 1.1 times Argentina's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Argentina ahead.
Argentina ranks 14th and Iraq ranks 11th of 186 countries.
Argentina has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher time to import: documentary compliance (hours), Argentina or Iraq?
- Iraq, at 176 DB16-20 methodology against 166 DB16-20 methodology in Argentina as of 2019.
- What is the difference in time to import: documentary compliance (hours) between Argentina and Iraq?
- 10 DB16-20 methodology, with Iraq ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Iraq?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Argentina and Iraq rank globally for time to import: documentary compliance (hours)?
- Argentina ranks 14th and Iraq ranks 11th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Time to import: Documentary compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The time for documentary compliance to import records the time associated with compliance with the import documentary requirements of all government agencies of the origin economy, the destination economy and any transit economies. It is calculated in hours. It includes the time for obtaining documents, preparing documents, processing documents, presenting documents and submitting documents. All electronic or paper submissions of information requested by any government agency in connection with the shipment are considered to be documents obtained, prepared and submitted during the import process. All documents prepared by the freight forwarder or customs broker for the product and partner pair assumed in the case study are included regardless of whether they are required by law or in practice. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.