Trinidad and Tobago vs Uruguay: Time to import (days)
Time to import (days) over time
- Trinidad and Tobago
- Uruguay
How they compare
Trinidad and Tobago currently reports 14 DB06-15 methodology against 14 DB06-15 methodology in Uruguay, a difference of 0 DB06-15 methodology.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
Trinidad and Tobago ranks 119th and Uruguay ranks 119th of 181 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Trinidad and Tobago averaged higher in 1 and Uruguay in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Trinidad and Tobago | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 26 DB06-15 methodology | 22.6 DB06-15 methodology | 3.4 DB06-15 methodology | Trinidad and Tobago |
| 2010s | 16 DB06-15 methodology | 18.4 DB06-15 methodology | 2.4 DB06-15 methodology | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher time to import (days), Trinidad and Tobago or Uruguay?
- Trinidad and Tobago, at 14 DB06-15 methodology against 14 DB06-15 methodology in Uruguay as of 2014.
- What is the difference in time to import (days) between Trinidad and Tobago and Uruguay?
- 0 DB06-15 methodology, with Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Trinidad and Tobago and Uruguay?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Trinidad and Tobago and Uruguay rank globally for time to import (days)?
- Trinidad and Tobago ranks 119th and Uruguay ranks 119th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The time to import records the time associated with importing a standardized cargo of goods by sea transport through 4 predefined stages: document preparation; customs clearance and inspections; inland transport and handling; and port and terminal handling. It is calulcated in calendar days. The time calculation for each of the 4 predefined stages starts from the moment the stage is initiated and runs until it is completed. Fast-track procedures applying only to certain accredited firms under authorized economic operator programs are not taken into account because they are not available to all trading companies. Sea transport time is not included. It is assumed that neither the exporter nor the importer wastes time and that each commits to completing the process without delay. It is assumed that document preparation, inland transport and handling, customs clearance and inspections, and port and terminal handling require a minimum time of 1 day each and cannot take place simultaneously. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.