Sudan vs Zambia: Time to import (days)

Sudan
46 DB06-15 methodology
in 2014
Zambia
53 DB06-15 methodology
in 2014
Sudan rank
17th
Zambia rank
15th

Time to import (days) over time

  • Sudan
  • Zambia
020406080200520092014

How they compare

Zambia currently reports 53 DB06-15 methodology against 46 DB06-15 methodology in Sudan, a difference of 7 DB06-15 methodology.

That makes Zambia's figure about 1.2 times Sudan's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Sudan ahead.

Sudan ranks 17th and Zambia ranks 15th of 181 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Sudan averaged higher in 1 and Zambia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sudan Zambia Difference Ahead
2000s 63 DB06-15 methodology 59 DB06-15 methodology 4 DB06-15 methodology Sudan
2010s 46 DB06-15 methodology 54.2 DB06-15 methodology 8.2 DB06-15 methodology Zambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher time to import (days), Sudan or Zambia?
Zambia, at 53 DB06-15 methodology against 46 DB06-15 methodology in Sudan as of 2014.
What is the difference in time to import (days) between Sudan and Zambia?
7 DB06-15 methodology, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sudan and Zambia?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Sudan and Zambia rank globally for time to import (days)?
Sudan ranks 17th and Zambia ranks 15th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology)
Unit
DB06-15 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The time to import records the time associated with importing a standardized cargo of goods by sea transport through 4 predefined stages: document preparation; customs clearance and inspections; inland transport and handling; and port and terminal handling. It is calulcated in calendar days. The time calculation for each of the 4 predefined stages starts from the moment the stage is initiated and runs until it is completed. Fast-track procedures applying only to certain accredited firms under authorized economic operator programs are not taken into account because they are not available to all trading companies. Sea transport time is not included. It is assumed that neither the exporter nor the importer wastes time and that each commits to completing the process without delay. It is assumed that document preparation, inland transport and handling, customs clearance and inspections, and port and terminal handling require a minimum time of 1 day each and cannot take place simultaneously. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.