Rwanda vs Tanzania: Time to import (days)

Rwanda
27 DB06-15 methodology
in 2014
Tanzania
26 DB06-15 methodology
in 2014
Rwanda rank
52nd
Tanzania rank
55th

Time to import (days) over time

  • Rwanda
  • Tanzania
20406080100200520092014

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 27 DB06-15 methodology against 26 DB06-15 methodology in Tanzania, a difference of 1 DB06-15 methodology.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Rwanda ahead.

Rwanda ranks 52nd and Tanzania ranks 55th of 181 countries.

Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Rwanda Tanzania Difference Ahead
2000s 67.2 DB06-15 methodology 34.6 DB06-15 methodology 32.6 DB06-15 methodology Rwanda
2010s 30.6 DB06-15 methodology 28.6 DB06-15 methodology 2 DB06-15 methodology Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher time to import (days), Rwanda or Tanzania?
Rwanda, at 27 DB06-15 methodology against 26 DB06-15 methodology in Tanzania as of 2014.
What is the difference in time to import (days) between Rwanda and Tanzania?
1 DB06-15 methodology, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Tanzania?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Rwanda and Tanzania rank globally for time to import (days)?
Rwanda ranks 52nd and Tanzania ranks 55th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology)
Unit
DB06-15 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The time to import records the time associated with importing a standardized cargo of goods by sea transport through 4 predefined stages: document preparation; customs clearance and inspections; inland transport and handling; and port and terminal handling. It is calulcated in calendar days. The time calculation for each of the 4 predefined stages starts from the moment the stage is initiated and runs until it is completed. Fast-track procedures applying only to certain accredited firms under authorized economic operator programs are not taken into account because they are not available to all trading companies. Sea transport time is not included. It is assumed that neither the exporter nor the importer wastes time and that each commits to completing the process without delay. It is assumed that document preparation, inland transport and handling, customs clearance and inspections, and port and terminal handling require a minimum time of 1 day each and cannot take place simultaneously. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.