India vs Kiribati: Time to import (days)
Time to import (days) over time
- India
- Kiribati
How they compare
India currently reports 21.06 DB06-15 methodology against 21 DB06-15 methodology in Kiribati, a difference of 0.06 DB06-15 methodology.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was India ahead.
India ranks 81st and Kiribati ranks 82nd of 181 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, India averaged higher in 1 and Kiribati in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | India | Kiribati | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 28.6 DB06-15 methodology | 21 DB06-15 methodology | 7.6 DB06-15 methodology | India |
| 2010s | 20.42 DB06-15 methodology | 21 DB06-15 methodology | 0.576 DB06-15 methodology | Kiribati |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher time to import (days), India or Kiribati?
- India, at 21.06 DB06-15 methodology against 21 DB06-15 methodology in Kiribati as of 2014.
- What is the difference in time to import (days) between India and Kiribati?
- 0.06 DB06-15 methodology, with India ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for India and Kiribati?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do India and Kiribati rank globally for time to import (days)?
- India ranks 81st and Kiribati ranks 82nd of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The time to import records the time associated with importing a standardized cargo of goods by sea transport through 4 predefined stages: document preparation; customs clearance and inspections; inland transport and handling; and port and terminal handling. It is calulcated in calendar days. The time calculation for each of the 4 predefined stages starts from the moment the stage is initiated and runs until it is completed. Fast-track procedures applying only to certain accredited firms under authorized economic operator programs are not taken into account because they are not available to all trading companies. Sea transport time is not included. It is assumed that neither the exporter nor the importer wastes time and that each commits to completing the process without delay. It is assumed that document preparation, inland transport and handling, customs clearance and inspections, and port and terminal handling require a minimum time of 1 day each and cannot take place simultaneously. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.