Equatorial Guinea vs Sudan: Time to import (days)
Time to import (days) over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Sudan
How they compare
Sudan currently reports 46 DB06-15 methodology against 44 DB06-15 methodology in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 2 DB06-15 methodology.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Sudan has been ahead every year.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 19th and Sudan ranks 17th of 181 countries.
Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 43.2 DB06-15 methodology | 63 DB06-15 methodology | 19.8 DB06-15 methodology | Sudan |
| 2010s | 44 DB06-15 methodology | 46 DB06-15 methodology | 2 DB06-15 methodology | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher time to import (days), Equatorial Guinea or Sudan?
- Sudan, at 46 DB06-15 methodology against 44 DB06-15 methodology in Equatorial Guinea as of 2014.
- What is the difference in time to import (days) between Equatorial Guinea and Sudan?
- 2 DB06-15 methodology, with Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Sudan?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Sudan rank globally for time to import (days)?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 19th and Sudan ranks 17th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The time to import records the time associated with importing a standardized cargo of goods by sea transport through 4 predefined stages: document preparation; customs clearance and inspections; inland transport and handling; and port and terminal handling. It is calulcated in calendar days. The time calculation for each of the 4 predefined stages starts from the moment the stage is initiated and runs until it is completed. Fast-track procedures applying only to certain accredited firms under authorized economic operator programs are not taken into account because they are not available to all trading companies. Sea transport time is not included. It is assumed that neither the exporter nor the importer wastes time and that each commits to completing the process without delay. It is assumed that document preparation, inland transport and handling, customs clearance and inspections, and port and terminal handling require a minimum time of 1 day each and cannot take place simultaneously. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.