Algeria vs Indonesia: Time to import (days)
Time to import (days) over time
- Algeria
- Indonesia
How they compare
Algeria currently reports 26 DB06-15 methodology against 26 DB06-15 methodology in Indonesia, a difference of 0 DB06-15 methodology.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Indonesia ahead.
Algeria ranks 55th and Indonesia ranks 55th of 181 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Algeria averaged higher in 1 and Indonesia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Algeria | Indonesia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 22.6 DB06-15 methodology | 27 DB06-15 methodology | 4.4 DB06-15 methodology | Indonesia |
| 2010s | 26 DB06-15 methodology | 25.2 DB06-15 methodology | 0.8 DB06-15 methodology | Algeria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher time to import (days), Algeria or Indonesia?
- Algeria, at 26 DB06-15 methodology against 26 DB06-15 methodology in Indonesia as of 2014.
- What is the difference in time to import (days) between Algeria and Indonesia?
- 0 DB06-15 methodology, with Algeria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Algeria and Indonesia?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Algeria and Indonesia rank globally for time to import (days)?
- Algeria ranks 55th and Indonesia ranks 55th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The time to import records the time associated with importing a standardized cargo of goods by sea transport through 4 predefined stages: document preparation; customs clearance and inspections; inland transport and handling; and port and terminal handling. It is calulcated in calendar days. The time calculation for each of the 4 predefined stages starts from the moment the stage is initiated and runs until it is completed. Fast-track procedures applying only to certain accredited firms under authorized economic operator programs are not taken into account because they are not available to all trading companies. Sea transport time is not included. It is assumed that neither the exporter nor the importer wastes time and that each commits to completing the process without delay. It is assumed that document preparation, inland transport and handling, customs clearance and inspections, and port and terminal handling require a minimum time of 1 day each and cannot take place simultaneously. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.