Puerto Rico vs Suriname: Time to import: Border compliance (hours)
Time to import: Border compliance (hours) over time
- Puerto Rico
- Suriname
How they compare
Puerto Rico currently reports 48 DB16-20 methodology against 48 DB16-20 methodology in Suriname, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Suriname has been ahead every year.
Puerto Rico ranks 97th and Suriname ranks 97th of 188 countries.
Suriname has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher time to import: border compliance (hours), Puerto Rico or Suriname?
- Puerto Rico, at 48 DB16-20 methodology against 48 DB16-20 methodology in Suriname as of 2019.
- What is the difference in time to import: border compliance (hours) between Puerto Rico and Suriname?
- 0 DB16-20 methodology, with Puerto Rico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Puerto Rico and Suriname?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Puerto Rico and Suriname rank globally for time to import: border compliance (hours)?
- Puerto Rico ranks 97th and Suriname ranks 97th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Time to import: Border compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The time for border compliance to import records the time associated with compliance with the economy’s customs regulations and with regulations relating to other inspections that are mandatory in order for the import shipment to cross the economy’s border, as well as the time and cost for handling that takes place at its port or border. It is calculate in hours. The time for this segment includes time for customs clearance and inspection procedures conducted by other agencies. If all customs clearance and other inspections take place at the port or border at the same time, the time estimate for border compliance takes this simultaneity into account. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.