Kosovo vs Tanzania: Time to import: Border compliance (hours)
Time to import: Border compliance (hours) over time
- Kosovo
- Tanzania
How they compare
Tanzania currently reports 402 DB16-20 methodology against 5.5 DB16-20 methodology in Kosovo, a difference of 396.5 DB16-20 methodology.
That makes Tanzania's figure about 73.1 times Kosovo's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Tanzania has been ahead every year.
Kosovo ranks 1st and Tanzania ranks 1st of 1 groups.
Tanzania has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher time to import: border compliance (hours), Kosovo or Tanzania?
- Tanzania, at 402 DB16-20 methodology against 5.5 DB16-20 methodology in Kosovo as of 2019.
- What is the difference in time to import: border compliance (hours) between Kosovo and Tanzania?
- 396.5 DB16-20 methodology, with Tanzania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kosovo and Tanzania?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Kosovo and Tanzania rank globally for time to import: border compliance (hours)?
- Kosovo ranks 1st and Tanzania ranks 1st of 1 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Time to import: Border compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The time for border compliance to import records the time associated with compliance with the economy’s customs regulations and with regulations relating to other inspections that are mandatory in order for the import shipment to cross the economy’s border, as well as the time and cost for handling that takes place at its port or border. It is calculate in hours. The time for this segment includes time for customs clearance and inspection procedures conducted by other agencies. If all customs clearance and other inspections take place at the port or border at the same time, the time estimate for border compliance takes this simultaneity into account. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.