Guatemala vs Kuwait: Time to import: Border compliance (hours)
Time to import: Border compliance (hours) over time
- Guatemala
- Kuwait
How they compare
Guatemala currently reports 72 DB16-20 methodology against 72 DB16-20 methodology in Kuwait, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Guatemala ahead.
Guatemala ranks 71st and Kuwait ranks 71st of 186 countries.
Kuwait has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher time to import: border compliance (hours), Guatemala or Kuwait?
- Guatemala, at 72 DB16-20 methodology against 72 DB16-20 methodology in Kuwait as of 2019.
- What is the difference in time to import: border compliance (hours) between Guatemala and Kuwait?
- 0 DB16-20 methodology, with Guatemala ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Kuwait?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Guatemala and Kuwait rank globally for time to import: border compliance (hours)?
- Guatemala ranks 71st and Kuwait ranks 71st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Time to import: Border compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The time for border compliance to import records the time associated with compliance with the economy’s customs regulations and with regulations relating to other inspections that are mandatory in order for the import shipment to cross the economy’s border, as well as the time and cost for handling that takes place at its port or border. It is calculate in hours. The time for this segment includes time for customs clearance and inspection procedures conducted by other agencies. If all customs clearance and other inspections take place at the port or border at the same time, the time estimate for border compliance takes this simultaneity into account. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.