Argentina vs Cape Verde: Time to import: Border compliance (hours)
Time to import: Border compliance (hours) over time
- Argentina
- Cape Verde
How they compare
Argentina currently reports 60 DB16-20 methodology against 60 DB16-20 methodology in Cape Verde, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Cape Verde has been ahead every year.
Argentina ranks 85th and Cape Verde ranks 85th of 186 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher time to import: border compliance (hours), Argentina or Cape Verde?
- Argentina, at 60 DB16-20 methodology against 60 DB16-20 methodology in Cape Verde as of 2019.
- What is the difference in time to import: border compliance (hours) between Argentina and Cape Verde?
- 0 DB16-20 methodology, with Argentina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Cape Verde?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Argentina and Cape Verde rank globally for time to import: border compliance (hours)?
- Argentina ranks 85th and Cape Verde ranks 85th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Time to import: Border compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The time for border compliance to import records the time associated with compliance with the economy’s customs regulations and with regulations relating to other inspections that are mandatory in order for the import shipment to cross the economy’s border, as well as the time and cost for handling that takes place at its port or border. It is calculate in hours. The time for this segment includes time for customs clearance and inspection procedures conducted by other agencies. If all customs clearance and other inspections take place at the port or border at the same time, the time estimate for border compliance takes this simultaneity into account. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.